@7YFGPVT

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only. Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan.

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes, but only if the information was legally obtained

E>E  Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

E>E  Personal answerYes, under the stipulation that the bailed out company re-acquire that equity within a given time or the company is wholly sold to the highest bidder to buy out the government stake. This program should administered by an independent entity which would be audited by congress

E>E  Personal answerNo, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

E>E  Personal answerYes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally

E>E  Personal answerYes, and nationalize the industry

E>E  Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally

E>E  Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

E>E  Personal answerThis is not an easy answer, but here goes. Law enforcement should have nationally standardized basic education requirements which states can expound on but not reduce. This education should cover and emphasize de-escalation, comprehensive basic sociology(including racial and gender equality), psychology, abnormal psychology, crisis/conflict resolution, basic medical/first aid, as well as the current tactical training they already receive. In whole academies should be much longer than the 9 week national average. Make a national certification test for academy graduates must pass before entering full time service. Mandate psychological evaluation and background checks before allowing entry into academies. Periodic psychological check ups and mandated independent counseling after high intensity events or when complaint investigations determine that the officer is operating outside of department guidelines. Limit unions abilities to shield officers that repeatedly violate policy and have zero tolerance policies for class B misdemeanor offences and higher. And cannot allow departments to rehire officers with out some sort of reconciliation or rehabilitation. We as a society expect a lot from local law enforcement. We either need to give them the tools they need to do all the things we think they should do, as an attempt to limit the risk of bodily damage or death to themselves and civilians. Or we limit the scope of what they do and employ other types of officers that handle non violent, non criminal activity. Communities need to get together with city and state officials at like an ongoing round-table to communicate the communities needs and concerns; then adjust action plans to best meet them.

E>E  Personal answerNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerIncrease

E>E  Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised

E>E  Personal answerYes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

E>E  Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes, and it should be at least two years of service

E>E  Personal answerDecrease

E>E  Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs

E>E  Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender

E>E  Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerNo

E>E  Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics

E>E  Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete

E>E  Personal answerYes

E>E  Personal answerMore, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

E>E  Personal answerYes, this will help create and save more jobs