United Party

Agree

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

The United Party may agree with increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, as they might see this as a way to improve public safety and reduce crime. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The United Party may somewhat agree with redirecting some funding to social and community-based programs, as they might see the potential benefits of addressing the root causes of crime and improving community relations. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

The United Party may slightly agree with replacing police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls, as they might see the potential benefits of reducing the use of force and improving community relations. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

The United Party may have a neutral stance on this issue, as they might recognize the importance of maintaining a well-funded police force while also understanding the potential benefits of investing in social and community-based programs. There is no specific historical example to support a strong stance on this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

The United Party would likely strongly disagree with abolishing the police, as they would recognize the importance of maintaining law and order in society. Abolishing the police would likely be seen as an extreme measure that could lead to increased crime and instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.