Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsNational securityStarted 10mos agoActive 5mos ago

Should the government invest in artificial intelligence (AI) for defense applications?

AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.

13 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10mos10MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10mos10MO

No

 @9WCRKNYAlliance of Hope from Kuala Lumpur  answered…5mos5MO

The government should invest in it but it needs to be cautious as well.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you personally feel about the idea of autonomous drones deciding whether to engage in combat without human input?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Could AI in military strategies one day reduce human casualties or will it simply lead to more advanced forms of warfare?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you think the use of AI in national defense aligns with our values around human rights and justice?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Could you trust a machine to defend your country, or does that responsibility need to stay with humans no matter what?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What worries you more: nations not adopting AI fast enough in defense or developing AI too quickly without enough oversight?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think AI could help prevent wars from happening or will it just escalate arms races between countries?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If AI systems are used for cyber defense, do you believe they can truly keep up with human hackers or outmaneuver them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How might AI in defense change the way governments and soldiers view the concept of 'sacrifice' in war, and is that a good thing?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What are your thoughts on who should be held responsible if an AI system makes a mistake that results in the loss of lives during a conflict?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think letting machines make life-and-death decisions in military conflicts is a necessary step forward or does it cross an ethical line?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

House Democrats Filibuster Flip-Flop: Keep It When the GOP’s in Charge, Kill It When We Are

Filibuster for me, but not for thee. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), an outspoken critic of the Senate filibuster, indicated Monday that she will not support axing the procedural hurdle as long as Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. “Am I championing getting rid of the filibuster now when the Senate has the trifecta? No,” the chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus said at a press conference on Capitol Hill. “But had we had the trifecta, I would have been, because we have to show that government can deliver,” Jayapal added. The Senate filibuster rule, which requires a 60-vote threshold to end debate and pass most types of legislation in the upper chamber, is seen as the best chance Democrats have at blocking the adoption of President-elect Donald Trump agenda – with Republicans taking a 53-47 seat advantage in the Senate and expected to retain a slim majority in the House. Jayapal, as recently as September, was pushing to “abolish” what she called the “Jim Crow filibuster.” “The filibuster was originally created *by mistake* in 1806,” she wrote on X. “Every day we don’t abolish it is just as big a mistake.”The Washington Democrat dislikes that the procedural tool makes it difficult for progressives to ram their agenda through Congress. “It’s the filibuster OR an assault weapons ban. It’s the filibuster OR codified abortion access. It’s the filibuster OR raising the minimum wage. It’s the filibuster OR protecting voting rights. The choice is clear. Abolish the Jim Crow filibuster,” Jayapal tweeted. The progressive rep argued Monday that passing a liberal agenda would’ve “built some trust with the American people.”“If we had had control of the trifecta and gotten rid of the filibuster to pass minimum wage, to pass paid sick leave, to pass many of these things that are passing – abortion access – that are passing on ballot measures that are so popular … then I think we would have built some trust with the American people,” Jayapal argued.

▲  226 replies