@ISIDEWITHQuestionselections8yrs ago

Should foreigners, currently residing in the United States, have the right to vote?

In most countries, suffrage, the right to vote, is generally limited to citizens of the country. Some countries, however, extend limited voting rights to resident non-citizens.

Answer Overview

Response rates from 417 Malaysia voters.

32%
Yes
68%
No
23%
Yes
61%
No
4%
Yes, but only after living in the country for 10 years
7%
No, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote
3%
Yes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote
2%
Yes, but only after living in the country for 5 years
0%
Yes, but they should only be allowed to vote in local elections
0%
Yes, but only if they are European Union citizens
0%
Yes, but they should not be allowed to vote in local elections

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 417 Malaysia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 417 Malaysia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Malaysia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8QFP2GZfrom Kuala Lumpur  answered…4yrs4Y

i strongly disagree allowing foreigners to be eligible to vote, this will cause an unfair vote and damage the system. Voting should and only should be done by legal citizen, if so foreigners are to be able to vote, some people will use this advantage to bribe foreigners to come to their country to vote for their leader.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Congress Calls Trump's Gaza Plan "Bizarre And Incoherent"

Trump proposed unprecedented U.S. control of Gaza Strip during a White House press conference with Netanyahu, suggesting "long-term ownership" that could last 10-15 years.The plan calls for nearly two million Palestinian residents to permanently relocate to neighboring countries, marking a dramatic shift from decades of U.S. policy.Congressional leaders from both parties expressed skepticism, with even Trump ally Lindsey Graham calling the proposal "problematic."Middle East experts, including former Palestinian Authority advisor Khaled Elgindy, criticized the plan as "bizarre and incoherent."White House officials argue mass relocation is the only viable option and seek to convince Egypt and Jordan to accept displaced Palestinians.The administration estimates Gaza reconstruction would take 10-15 years, far longer than the 3-5 years outlined in cease-fire agreements.The proposal lacks clear details on how to handle Palestinian resistance to relocation or potential U.S. military deployment.Saudi Arabia immediately rejected the plan, stating it wouldn't normalize ties with Israel without a clear path to Palestinian statehood.Trump expressed uncertainty about the current cease-fire's durability while presenting his proposal.The plan faces significant implementation challenges and could complicate other regional objectives, including Israel-Saudi normalization efforts.

▲  2321 replies